A COMPLIANCE–QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ESG DISCLOSURE: EVIDENCE FROM BANK BRI UNDER SEOJK 16/2021 FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Satya Awang Kurniawan Universitas Brawijaya
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v18i1.7658

Keywords:

Sustainability report, ESG Disclosure, POJK 51/2017, SEOJK 16/2021

Abstract

Research Purposes. This study analyzes Bank BRI’s ESG disclosure in terms of compliance with sustainability report presentation and ESG disclosure quality in its sustainability report for the period 2021 – 2023, based on SEOJK 16/2021.

Research Methods This study employs a qualitative approach and content analysis.

Research Results and Findings. The results show that Bank BRI has presented its sustainability report for the period 2021 – 2023 in accordance with SEOJK 16/2021, with consecutive scores of 80.13, 88.00, and 87.25 on a scale of 100. The ESG disclosure analysis identifies several areas that require special attention. The implications of this research are expected to be the basis for further research to measure and analyze corporate sustainability reports in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhariani, D., & du Toit, E. (2020). Readability of sustainability reports: evidence from Indo-nesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Econ-omies, 10(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-10-2019-0194

Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M., & Lee, S. H. (2024). Envi-ronmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustain-ability: a scientometric review of global trends. Dalam Environment, Development and Sustainability (Vol. 26, Nomor 2, hlm. 2965–2987). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x

Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance trans-formation through ESG disclosure. Sustaina-bility (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910

Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791

Buallay, A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study be-tween manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Per-formance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371

Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability report-ing: economic analysis and literature re-view. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5

Christine, Y., & Meiden, C. (2021). ANALISIS PENGUNGKAPAN SUSTAINABILITY RE-PORT PT. WASKITA KARYA (PERSERO) TBK DAN YTL CORPORATION BERHAD TAHUN 2018 BERDASARKAN GRI STANDARDS. Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v10i1.794

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderat-ing role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Jour-nal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Fauzi, H. (2022). The evolution of sustainability reporting practices in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Pro-duction, 358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131798

Jeanice, J., & Kim, S. S. (2023). Pengaruh Penera-pan ESG Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan di In-donesia. Owner, 7(2), 1646–1653. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1338

Meutia, I., Yuniarti, E., & Daud, R. (2023). EVAL-UATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OJK CIRCULAR LETTER NUMBER 16 OF 2021. BUSINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY, 1(1), 103–114.

Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate govern-ance on the sustainability report quality. In-ternational Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2017-0071

Sari, N. (2014). Analisis Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI): Studi Kasus Pe-rusahaan Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk dan Timah (Persero) Tbk. 5. 527. 10.21512/bbr.v5i2.1013. Binus Business Review, 5, 527. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v5i2.1013

Tang, H. (2022). The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediat-ing Role of Financial Constraints and Agen-cy Cost. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073769

Tsalis, T. A., Malamateniou, K. E., Koulouriotis, D., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2020). New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable devel-opment and the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Envi-ronmental Management, 27(4), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1910

Yu, E. P. yi, Luu, B. Van, & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in Interna-tional Business and Finance, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192

Downloads

Published

22-01-2026

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.