Damage Detection Based on Recorded Damaged Natural Frequencies Using Binary Bat Algorithm

Authors

  • Richard Frans Universitas Atma Jaya Makassar
  • Yoyong Arfiadi Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Keywords:

damage detection, binary bat algorithm, modal assurance criterion

Abstract

The health monitoring system cycle for a structure has a significant impact on damage detection. The life cycle of a structure can be improved through the implementation of effective damage detection techniques. This is because the identification, prevention, and repair of damaged structural elements can be conducted with precision and speed. This study suggests a technique for identifying structural components that have been damaged. This approach involves comparing the recorded natural frequency to its actual natural frequency for all potential damage scenarios. The Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) has been used to compare these two natural frequency values, while a binary value is used to indicate whether an element has been damaged or not. Two types of structures are considered: (1) shear building structures and (2) plane truss structures. Several damage scenarios are used to test the accuracy of the proposed method. According to the results, the binary bat algorithm in conjunction with MAC produces accurate results for the two categories of structures examined under several kinds of damage scenarios, such as single, double, and multiple damage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bernal, D. (2000). Damage localization using load vectors. COST F3, Madrid, Spain, June 2000, 223–231.

[2] Pandey, A. K., Biswas, M., & Samman, M. M. (1991). Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol 145, 312–332.

[3] Farrar, C. R., Duffey, T. A., Cornwell, P. J., and Doebling, S. W. (1999). Excitation methods for bridge structures. Proceedings of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee, FL, February 1999, 1-7.

[4] Frans, R. And Arfiadi, Y. (2023). Analysis of enhanced damage locating vector (EDLV) on truss structure. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 24, 2879–2892.

[5] Frans, R. And Arfiadi, Y. (2024). Damage detection in space truss structures using a third-level approach. Discover Civil Engineering, 1-13.

[6] Kaveh, A. And Dadras, A. (2018). Structural damage identification using an enhanced thermal exchange optimization algorithm. Engineering Optimization, Vol 50 (3), 430–445.

[7] Kaveh, A. And Mohsen, M. (2014). Damage detection in skeletal structures based on charged system search optimization using incomplete modal data. International Journal of Civil Engineering, IUST, Vol 12(2), 291–298.

[8] Kaveh, A. And Zolghadr, A. (2012). An improved charged system search for structural damage identification in beams and frames using changes in natural frequencies. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, Vol 2(3), 321–339.

[9] Gao, Y., Spencer, B. F., and Bernal, D. (2007). Experimental verification of the flexibility-based damage locating vector method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133(10).

[10] Ji, X. D., and Qian, J. R. (2008). Principle and application of damage locating vector methods. Engineering Mechanics, Vol 25(4), 10–20.

[11] Radzieński, M., & Krawczuk, M. (2009). Experimental verification and comparison of mode shape-based damage detection methods. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol 181, 012011.

[12] Rytter, A. (1993). Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures (Doctoral dissertation). University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark.

[13] Yang, X. S. (2010). Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier.

[14] Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., and Yang, X. S. (2014). Binary bat algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol 25, 663–681.

[15] Yang, X. S. (2014). Nature-inspired optimization algorithms (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

[16] Allemang, R. J. (2003). The modal assurance criterion - Twenty years of use and abuse. Sound & Vibration, Vol 37(8), 14–23.

[17] MathWorks. (2021). MATLAB: Programming Fundamental (Version 9.10) [Software]. The MathWorks, Inc.

[18] MathWorks. (2023). MATLAB: Primer (Version 9.14) [Software]. The MathWorks, Inc.

[19] Sim, S. H., Jang, S. A., Spencer, B. F., and Song, J. (2008). Reliability-based evaluation of the performance of the damage locating vector method. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol 23, 489–495.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Section

Artikel